Summation based benchmark for calculators

[emece67]

(12-24-2017 09:09 AM)pier4r Wrote:  Going back to the benchmark topic. Is there anyone willing to do the test with a:
- a 41 version
- 41 CL
- dm41 --> covered by grbanks
- hp 42s
- 35s --> covered by grbanks
- 12C (recent)
- 15C (LE got covered by Gilles)

• hp 15C
  • 10: 32'', 13.71183502
  • 100: 320'', 139.2971874
    
• DM15L (@12 MHz)
  • 10: 6'', 13.71183502
  • 100: 63'', 139.2971874
    
• DM15L (@48 MHz)
  • 100: 14'', 139.2971874
  • 1000: 133'', 1395.346288
    

- 71B
- 67
- 34S

• wp34s (DSE-based loop, DBLOFF)
  • 10: 3'', 13.71183501670439
  • 100: 26'', 139.2971870459241
  • 1000: 256'', 1395.346287743423
    
• wp34s (DSE-based loop, DBLON)
  • 10: 3'', 13.71183501670437880652763283584306
  • 100: 27'', 139.2971870459242385751150019615150
  • 1000: 285'', 1395.346287743423256291575365067091
    
• wp34s (\(\Sigma\) command, DBLOFF)
  • 10: 3'', 13.71183501670438
  • 100: 30'', 139.2971870459242
  • 1000: 303'', 1395.346287743423
    
• wp34s (\(\Sigma\) command, DBLON)
  • 10: 3'', 13.71183501670437880652763283584306
  • 100: 34'', 139.2971870459242385751150019615149
  • 1000: 332'', 1395.346287743423256291575365067093
    

Amazed by the really small (~10 %) increase in time in the wp34s when switched from 16 to 34 digits.