on the RPN mentioning sharp pc-1211, v.albillo, el-506w and recurring topics

[pier4r]

(12-03-2017 09:42 PM)Maximilian Hohmann Wrote:  No. But the equation writer of the 48 is incredibly bad. So bad that there is really no point in using it. It should be used as an example on computer science courses on how not to design a user interface. Unless of course one grew up with it and got to love it before seeing different solutions.

Interesting point of view. Would it be possible for you to point to a similar equation writer that is "slick" ?

I know only the autocomplete/autocorrect in word (from 2007 onwards) using the UTN notes (n1) that once one sets up it properly, is quite fast.

Way faster than my attempts with latex.

n1: http://unicode.org/notes/tn28/