(50g) FNINVARS: Object finder for couch hackers
|
10-11-2017, 06:50 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: (50g) FNINVARS: Object finder for couch hackers
(10-11-2017 05:36 AM)Joe Horn Wrote: BYTES: 305.5 #6E26h I have this program (I think the exact same) already in my 50g, so to confirm it's the exact same, I did 'FNINVARS' BYTES, which produces [318. #6E26], a difference of 12.5 bytes. Checksums match, so I'm confidant the code is the same. Recalling the object itself on the stack as an argument to BYTES produces a smaller size (this does not include the name field, which is included when done using the global VAR name), and doing so does yield a smaller size, but the difference is not what I expected. The AUR states: "If the argument is a global name, then the size represents the name and its contents, while the checksum represents the contents only. The size of the name alone is (3.5 + n), where n is the number of characters in the name." Since the name FNINVARS is 8 bytes, the difference should be 11.5 bytes, vs. the 12.5 I'm getting. The same pattern is true for other VARs, so this isn't unique to this program. I'm sure it's a simple thing, but anyone know why these are different? --Bob Prosperi |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
(50g) FNINVARS: Object finder for couch hackers - Joe Horn - 10-11-2017, 05:36 AM
RE: (50g) FNINVARS: Object finder for couch hackers - Gerald H - 10-11-2017, 07:06 AM
RE: (50g) FNINVARS: Object finder for couch hackers - pier4r - 10-11-2017, 03:31 PM
RE: (50g) FNINVARS: Object finder for couch hackers - rprosperi - 10-11-2017 06:50 PM
RE: (50g) FNINVARS: Object finder for couch hackers - DavidM - 10-11-2017, 08:38 PM
RE: (50g) FNINVARS: Object finder for couch hackers - rprosperi - 10-12-2017, 02:21 AM
FLIBS: Library Finder for couch hackers - rprosperi - 10-16-2017, 12:01 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)