Post Reply 
Which calculators had no known bugs?
11-23-2020, 08:34 PM (This post was last modified: 06-14-2021 09:33 PM by [kby].)
Post: #57
RE: Which calculators had no known bugs?
(11-23-2020 10:43 AM)vassilisprevelakis Wrote:  I am going to be provocative here, by nominating the HP-9825 as the calculator with no known bugs.

In http://hp9825.com/html/hpl.html it mentions that The language ROMs were never replaced in the field due to a bug.

So while not a calculator as we think about them, it was marketed as a calculator and it had no bugs.

**vp

http://www.series80.org

If the criterion is ROM replacements then probably many things qualify. Did the -45, -80, -65, -55 have ROM replacements? I guess technically the -45 had one to reverse the storage register arithmetic, although I wouldn’t put that in the category of bug. The museum has no bugs listed for the Stings or Woodstocks, but Bernhard started this thread talking about a Woodstock.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Which calculators had no known bugs? - [kby] - 11-23-2020 08:34 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)