For which models was 2^3>8?

Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

For which models was 2^3>8?

04-04-2017, 10:14 PM

Post: #14

bshoring Offline

Member

Posts: 266
Joined: Dec 2013

RE: For which models was 2^3>8?

Because the earliest calculators didn't have the 3 guard digits, you could do 1.000001 Enter 1,000,000 y^x and get e (2.718281828). This doesn't work on the HP-22 and later calculators. The first 2 financial calcs don't have e^x.

Regards,
Bob

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

For which models was 2^3>8? - Joe Horn - 04-04-2017, 05:03 AM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - james summers - 04-04-2017, 06:26 AM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - Joe Horn - 04-04-2017, 12:17 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - james summers - 04-04-2017, 01:05 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - Dave Britten - 04-04-2017, 03:28 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - pier4r - 04-04-2017, 05:20 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - Dieter - 04-04-2017, 05:51 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - Thomas Okken - 04-04-2017, 10:26 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - Dave Britten - 04-05-2017, 11:34 AM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - pier4r - 04-04-2017, 06:10 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - bshoring - 04-04-2017, 06:16 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - teenix - 04-05-2017, 07:50 AM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - bshoring - 04-05-2017, 06:08 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - james summers - 04-04-2017, 06:45 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - Dieter - 04-04-2017, 07:18 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - james summers - 04-04-2017, 07:42 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - Dieter - 04-04-2017, 07:53 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - bshoring - 04-04-2017 10:14 PM

RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - Andres - 06-23-2020, 04:39 AM

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)