Simpson revival
|
09-28-2016, 02:00 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Simpson revival
(09-28-2016 12:25 PM)Dieter Wrote:(09-28-2016 08:04 AM)Pekis Wrote: The problem with Simpson's rule for calculating a definite integral is that you have to specify the number of intervals. I surely reinvented the wheel but I found a way to deal with a given tolerance (e.g. 1E-5), WITHOUT wasting any calculation in the process. A few years ago I replaced the Trapezoidal rule use in Romberg with Simpson's method (and also tried using other quadrature algorithms). You can check it here and click on the link A New Face of Romberg Integration . There is a link next to it that allows you to download a related Excel demo file by Graeme Dennes. Namir |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Simpson revival - Pekis - 09-28-2016, 08:04 AM
RE: Simpson revival - Namir - 09-28-2016, 10:40 AM
RE: Simpson revival - Dieter - 09-28-2016, 12:25 PM
RE: Simpson revival - Namir - 09-28-2016 02:00 PM
RE: Simpson revival - Namir - 09-28-2016, 03:50 PM
RE: Simpson revival - Dieter - 09-28-2016, 10:00 PM
RE: Simpson revival - Albert Chan - 07-31-2018, 02:57 PM
RE: Simpson revival - Namir - 09-29-2016, 04:44 PM
RE: Simpson revival - Dieter - 09-29-2016, 06:23 PM
RE: Simpson revival - Namir - 09-29-2016, 10:27 PM
RE: Simpson revival - Dieter - 09-30-2016, 06:00 AM
RE: Simpson revival - Dieter - 10-02-2016, 03:29 PM
RE: Simpson revival - Namir - 10-02-2016, 04:48 PM
RE: Simpson revival - Namir - 10-09-2016, 03:14 AM
RE: Simpson revival - Albert Chan - 08-04-2018, 05:29 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)