[HP-35s] direct stack designation
|
09-05-2016, 09:27 PM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [HP-35s] direct stack designation
Hey Dieter, thanks for chiming in.
(09-05-2016 08:56 PM)Dieter Wrote: But, more important: the 35s was never designed as a successor to the HP41. I think you nailed it. I might be a little too fascinated by the object and the design, enough to blind me when it comes to selecting the right machine. Excellent advocating of the 35s by the way. I'll probably never use half of all this power! |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
[HP-35s] direct stack designation - Eamoex - 09-05-2016, 02:20 PM
RE: [HP-35s] direct stack designation - wojtek - 09-05-2016, 02:59 PM
RE: [HP-35s] direct stack designation - Didier Lachieze - 09-05-2016, 03:31 PM
RE: [HP-35s] direct stack designation - Eamoex - 09-05-2016, 08:17 PM
RE: [HP-35s] direct stack designation - Dieter - 09-05-2016, 08:56 PM
RE: [HP-35s] direct stack designation - Eamoex - 09-05-2016 09:27 PM
RE: [HP-35s] direct stack designation - Massimo Gnerucci - 09-05-2016, 09:41 PM
RE: [HP-35s] direct stack designation - Eamoex - 09-05-2016, 03:36 PM
RE: [HP-35s] direct stack designation - Massimo Gnerucci - 09-05-2016, 05:02 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)