Units; StdP value vs. non values
|
05-09-2016, 06:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-09-2016 06:47 PM by Tim Wessman.)
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Units; StdP value vs. non values
(05-09-2016 06:13 PM)toshk Wrote: StdP; non value 101.325_kPa. Correct Actually, it has been this way even back to the 48 series. The constant lib there returns a value of 101.325 when you don't have units attached. When you are not using units, the assumption is just that in the end you interpret as kPa. I remember looking at this extensively and talking to a few physics/chemistry professors before deciding to match what was done before. I'm open to change it, but the behavior does seem to make sense in actual practice. TW Although I work for HP, the views and opinions I post here are my own. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Units; StdP value vs. non values - toshk - 05-09-2016, 06:13 PM
RE: Units; StdP value vs. non values - Tim Wessman - 05-09-2016 06:46 PM
RE: Units; StdP value vs. non values - toshk - 05-09-2016, 07:38 PM
RE: Units; StdP value vs. non values - informach - 05-09-2016, 11:31 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)