newRPL: Angles revisited

04012016, 06:27 PM
Post: #14




RE: newRPL: Angles revisited
(04012016 05:48 PM)Han Wrote:(04012016 05:33 PM)Helix Wrote: Why? I think that it is so useful to be able to divide an angle by two, or three (etc.) that division (or multiplication) by a real number should leave the result as an angle. If the intent is to divide one angle by another then the divisor can be explicitly tagged as an angle. So 30D 3 / gives 10D; 30D 3D / gives 10. I agree that 30D 3 / is ambiguous  does 3 mean "3" or "3D" or "3R" in radians mode?  but I think that this is the best way to resolve the ambiguity. Nigel (UK) 

« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)