WP 34S --> WP 31S

[Manolo Sobrino]

(04-13-2014 09:35 AM)walter b Wrote:  OK, I admit I looked to the Rubik fun part only (with a sleeping grandparent on my shoulder ), i.e. your last layout - and it's looking quite a lot better than the one you posted yesterday. I think we can agree on that so far

What I'm not happy with is the statistcal area (pun intended). I'd suggest putting DISTR (the last letter is important here - we're not talking about DISTances) on shifted 9, x_bar and s on shifted 5 and 6, y_hat and r on shifted 1 and 2, respectively.

And we've to reduce the top left shifted label since it's 5 characters long: I recommend deleting three characters there ...

d:-)

I'd take a look at the sequence of them with some pause and consideration . My serious choice is the next to last one, which differs in just a two-key permutation. The areas are almost fixed right now. You have to pay more attention to the column {x^bar, y^hat, r}. It makes sense and acts as a delimiter.

I do not dislike your idea of putting DISTR on 9, or on 8 for that matter, with STAT on 9. We might agree with a 4-character label DSTR. All this breaks somehow the columns that are the theme of the numpad, but it might work. Then s could be on top of Sigma+, x^bar at 6 and y^hat at 5 on top of r at 2. If I put something on shifted 1, then the couple POL/RECT falls apart. They are placed nicely now. Current statistics are in a compact 3x2 group, you can shuffle them within their box, leaving them get out of there would break things not easy to glue again. Not at all.

I'll think about the choices in there. I have to check a few more things before.

I have the solution to the LOG issue. The layout keeps a printed LOG but comes with a black marker so whoever is willing to have LG can cover the "O", that's just because it's much harder the other way around . L G is awfully close to LG... I could try a thin "O" to make it even a closer match . The "10" can go now, it didn't deserve it though...