WP 34S --> WP 31S
|
02-12-2014, 01:35 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-12-2014 01:37 AM by Jonathan Cameron.)
Post: #108
|
|||
|
|||
RE: WP 34S --> WP 31S
(02-12-2014 01:15 AM)Sanjeev Visvanatha Wrote: a. STO / RCL +-*/ - this seems necessaryI agree this seems useful. (02-12-2014 01:15 AM)Sanjeev Visvanatha Wrote: b. STO / RCL --> - Not sure indirection is requiredI do not think STO/RCL indirection is useful except in programming. Anything that you might use the indirection for in this calculator should really be done on a programmable calculator or a computer. (02-12-2014 01:15 AM)Sanjeev Visvanatha Wrote: c. STO / RCL X Y Z T (and A B C D in SSIZE8) - is there a need for this in a non-programmable?I am not sure about this one. Maybe? (02-12-2014 01:15 AM)Sanjeev Visvanatha Wrote: d. STO / RCL ▲ / ▼ - I can see requiring this type of Max/Min operation in programming, but not sure for ordinary use.I was not aware of this and had to look it up in the manual. I think that this is more useful in programming. (02-12-2014 01:15 AM)Sanjeev Visvanatha Wrote: 2. Regarding "Last x". Is "FILL" used so much that it requires the coveted [f] ENTER position? Would a Shifted Last x be more useful for RPN beginners? Keep in mind, as in the WP-34S, a RCL L will do a traditional Last x, but the finger travel is awfully long in this layout. Thoughts? (Yes, I know some of the design team have strong opinions on this, and there was a discussion a few years back)I find 'fill' useful to clear the stack. I think we should have an easy way to clear the stack (especially since we cannot see all of it at any one time). If we add CLSTK to the CLEAR menu, then I think relegating FILL to the MORE menu would be fine. I do not have a strong opinion about 'Last x' vs 'RCL L' |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)