Search
Member List
Calendar
Help
|
digits in x
|
|
11-24-2015, 12:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-24-2015 12:09 PM by fhub.)
Post: #15
|
|||
|
|||
RE: digits in x
(11-24-2015 11:05 AM)ggauny@live.fr Wrote: .. of course a bit slowly on the truth WP34s, ..Yes, a calculator is just not the right tool for running longer programs. Although I've already reduced the tested numbers by 80% (because only numbers n with n MOD 9 = 0 or 1 can be Kaprekar numbers), but up to 1 million this still makes 200000 numbers which have to be checked - a hard task for a real calculator. BTW, removing the 2 labels LBL 00/01 and replacing the GTO 00/01 by BACK xx, you can even save 2 more steps ... (just in case you're a fan of minimalistic programs)  Franz |
|||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-22-2015, 04:29 PM
RE: digits in x - Didier Lachieze - 11-22-2015, 04:58 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-22-2015, 05:22 PM
RE: digits in x - fhub - 11-22-2015, 05:40 PM
RE: digits in x - Marcus von Cube - 11-22-2015, 05:43 PM
RE: digits in x - Dieter - 11-22-2015, 05:49 PM
RE: digits in x - Marcus von Cube - 11-22-2015, 05:51 PM
RE: digits in x - Didier Lachieze - 11-22-2015, 05:56 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-22-2015, 06:33 PM
RE: digits in x - fhub - 11-23-2015, 11:58 AM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 09:34 AM
RE: digits in x - Dieter - 11-22-2015, 05:46 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-23-2015, 04:48 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 11:05 AM
RE: digits in x - fhub - 11-24-2015 12:07 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 07:03 PM
RE: digits in x - ggauny@live.fr - 11-24-2015, 07:39 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)