Post Reply 
Hp 12c Simple PV
10-29-2014, 07:48 PM
Post: #2
RE: Hp 12c Simple PV
Define "should be" :-)

Excel gives $1,374.46 to =PV(0.06,1.5,0,1500)

That's what the 10bII+, 17bII+, and the 12c in "C" mode (press STO EEX and solve this on the 12c).

So, I'm guessing this must be a TI model that has defined "should be" ? Again :-)

Partial periods require more information in order to solve them. Can you get Excel to give the 1376.15? If so, by what formula ?

That will help us know how to help. All questions are good, hence the smileys here.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Hp 12c Simple PV - Ramused - 10-29-2014, 07:00 PM
RE: Hp 12c Simple PV - Gene - 10-29-2014 07:48 PM
RE: Hp 12c Simple PV - Ramused - 10-29-2014, 11:04 PM
RE: Hp 12c Simple PV - Gene - 10-30-2014, 02:47 AM
RE: Hp 12c Simple PV - Thomas Ritschel - 10-30-2014, 09:31 AM
RE: Hp 12c Simple PV - Ramused - 10-30-2014, 12:55 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)