[VA] SRC #009 - Pi Day 2021 Special
|
03-16-2021, 08:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-16-2021 08:59 PM by J-F Garnier.)
Post: #16
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [VA] SRC #009 - Pi Day 2021 Special
(03-16-2021 06:36 PM)Valentin Albillo Wrote:J-F Garnier Wrote:For point (c), well ... it's a nice identityIf you say so ... this means you think that 2 + 2 = 4 is a "nice identity" too ? By identity, I meant that the expression is independent from the 'e' value, and always produces \(\pi\), quite similar to arctan(1/x) = \(\pi\)/2 - arctan(x) (for x>0). I'm ready to admit that identity not the correct word, if you think so. Quote:J-F Garnier Wrote:I don't think we can say that the equation e^(i π) + 1 = 0 can be used to get π from e. If you try to get π from this expression, you will just end with π = acos(-1). Right but how, practically, do you compute a complex logarithm ? log(z) = log(abs(z)) + i.arg(z) [1] for z=(-1,0) , log(abs(z)) = 0 and arg(z)=atan2(0,-1) [ANGLE(-1,0) in HP-71's BASIC ] So, we get \(\pi\) = loge(-1) / i = atan2(0,-1) No 'e' value involved anywhere. [1] This is the method used to compute log(z) in the HP-71's Math ROM, and all RPN/RPL descendants, and very likely the 15C too. Quote:J-F Garnier Wrote:I don't know -and don't think there is - any relation that can be used to get π from e. Looking forward to see examples, if included in your final comments ! J-F |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)