HP49-50G Lambert function
|
10-20-2020, 10:44 PM
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP49-50G Lambert function
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
For negative numbers, I get the same complex numbers as when using Wolfram Alpha, and that up to -190. Beyond that number, I get different — but possible, correct — results. My program W(-190.,0.): (3.73813626409,-2.54403205829) = result given by Wolfram. But W(-191.,0.): (3.0807478,-8.212851). not equal W(-191_Wolfram ): (3.742525,2.544493). Strange? Could you have a check in your program for w(-191 + 0i)? Thanks and regards. By the way, when solving for x^2 = 2 ^x, I find only 2 real solutions : -. 766 and 2; no way to find by calculus the missing real solution x=4. Could you help me? Regards, Gil Campart |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
HP49-50G Lambert function - Gil - 10-17-2020, 08:42 PM
RE: HP49-50G Lambert function - Gil - 10-18-2020, 10:22 AM
RE: HP49-50G Lambert function W(z) - Gil - 10-19-2020, 09:06 AM
RE: HP49-50G Lambert function - Gil - 10-19-2020, 09:13 AM
RE: HP49-50G Lambert function - Albert Chan - 10-20-2020, 01:48 AM
RE: HP49-50G Lambert function - Gil - 10-19-2020, 09:40 AM
RE: HP49-50G Lambert function - Gil - 10-20-2020, 08:28 AM
RE: HP49-50G Lambert function - Gil - 10-20-2020, 08:42 AM
RE: HP49-50G Lambert function - Albert Chan - 10-20-2020, 04:40 PM
RE: HP49-50G Lambert function - Gil - 10-20-2020 10:44 PM
RE: HP49-50G Lambert function - Albert Chan - 10-21-2020, 02:54 AM
RE: HP49-50G Lambert function - Albert Chan - 10-21-2020, 12:13 PM
RE: HP49-50G Lambert function - Gil - 10-21-2020, 11:44 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: