hp65 vs 41c vs 35s µbenchmark
|
05-31-2014, 03:30 PM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: hp65 vs 41c vs 35s µbenchmark
(05-31-2014 02:44 PM)GeorgeOfTheJungle Wrote: In the link that Massimo has posted (btw, thanks, Massimo) it says: Bear in mind, those were 60-second tests, with a shorter program and pre-loaded stack (label searches may be faster). (05-31-2014 02:51 PM)GeorgeOfTheJungle Wrote: LBL + ??? I can't do that in my hp! Why do you use + instead of B? The 58/59 used weird labeling. You had A-E corresponding to the five hot-keys at the top, and A'-E', the same hot-keys prefixed with 2nd. These would normally be used for your program's entry points. You could also use (almost) any other non-numeric key for a label, which could be called with SBR or GTO. GTO with numeric arguments would be interpreted as a branch to a step number, so that's probably why you couldn't use 0-9 as labels. Program steps were 100% not merged, so this scheme was probably easier for the parser/state machine. Treat any key code after LBL/GTO/SBR as a label, and a single digit key-code (00-09) after GTO/SBR as a trigger to grab the next step's key code and build a 3-digit step number out of them. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)