Post Reply 
hp65 vs 41c vs 35s µbenchmark
05-31-2014, 02:44 PM
Post: #7
RE: hp65 vs 41c vs 35s µbenchmark
(05-31-2014 02:22 PM)Dave Britten Wrote:  I'm getting about 2,597 on my 32S. I was mistakenly thinking that model supported branching backwards with negative values for GTO (i), but that doesn't appear to be the case, so that's just a standard LBL/GTO approach.

7.9x, meh... :-)

(05-31-2014 02:22 PM)Dave Britten Wrote:  
(05-31-2014 01:23 PM)GeorgeOfTheJungle Wrote:  Is the "original" 30b rpn programmable? If it is, could you try that too?

It is, but I don't have an "original" 30b to test, unfortunately. I only had one for about an hour or so!

No wonder... :-)

In the link that Massimo has posted (btw, thanks, Massimo) it says:

HP 30b
Count: 72,517
Code: LBL 00 + GOTO 00
(as first program in memory)

And that's more or less ok, between 130x and 280x, ~= your 34s.

(05-31-2014 01:23 PM)GeorgeOfTheJungle Wrote:  I think I'll write a test for my TI-58C so I can have a laugh at how slow that thing is. I think one of the Op routines increments a register, so I don't have to bring AOS into the mix at least. I'll be surprised if it hits 200, though.

Perhaps it's overclock-able...
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: hp65 vs 41c vs 35s µbenchmark - GeorgeOfTheJungle - 05-31-2014 02:44 PM
RE: hp65 vs 41c vs 35s µbenchmark - pito - 06-05-2014, 05:49 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)