hp65 vs 41c vs 35s µbenchmark

[Dave Britten]

TI-58C results...

Code:

000 76 LBL
001 11 A
002 00 0
003 42 STO
004 00 0
005 76 LBL
006 85 +
007 69 Op
008 20 20 (Op 20 increments reg 00)
009 61 GTO
010 85 +

I get a whopping 133. That could probably be improved with fast mode.

Using 1 SUM 00 instead of Op 20 got me 134, which I'd call equal within experimental error.

With GTO directly to an address, I only got 127. I guess with this small of a program, the label search is slightly faster than interpreting the 3-step GTO 0 05 vs. the two-step GTO +.