Post Reply 
hp65 vs 41c vs 35s µbenchmark
05-31-2014, 02:22 PM
Post: #5
RE: hp65 vs 41c vs 35s µbenchmark
I'm getting about 2,597 on my 32S. I was mistakenly thinking that model supported branching backwards with negative values for GTO (i), but that doesn't appear to be the case, so that's just a standard LBL/GTO approach.

(05-31-2014 01:23 PM)GeorgeOfTheJungle Wrote:  Is the "original" 30b rpn programmable? If it is, could you try that too?

It is, but I don't have an "original" 30b to test, unfortunately. I only had one for about an hour or so!

I think I'll write a test for my TI-58C so I can have a laugh at how slow that thing is. I think one of the Op routines increments a register, so I don't have to bring AOS into the mix at least. I'll be surprised if it hits 200, though.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: hp65 vs 41c vs 35s µbenchmark - Dave Britten - 05-31-2014 02:22 PM
RE: hp65 vs 41c vs 35s µbenchmark - pito - 06-05-2014, 05:49 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)