newRPL - Updated to build 1510 [official build remains at 1487]
|
08-10-2021, 03:43 PM
Post: #164
|
|||
|
|||
RE: newRPL - Updated to build 1487 [ including official build]
I agree that AND is rather non-intuitive for concatenating lists, on the other hand CAT makes me think CATalog more than conCATenation. Haskell uses ++ which I like but I doubt that the parser could handle it. Also potentially confusing since ++ means increment in C.
I also like the idea of FORSTEP/STARTSTEP but I'm not sure which syntax I prefer. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)