(41C) Pythagorean Triples
|
06-27-2022, 05:51 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: (41C) Pythagorean Triples
With obvious transformations, I thought more of something like: STO+ ST X \(\mapsto\) ST+ X.
Thanks for improving my program. Using DSE instead of ISG avoids the calculation of the index. Also by using it twice in a row we still use a step size of 2: Code: 07 LBL 00 I should have remembered that with STO Z we also have tuck ~ swap over: Code: 18 LBL 03 I would probably rather use SIGN instead of 10^X to map \(0 \mapsto 1\) but its nice to add both \(1 + 1 = 2\) and use the result as a factor when calculating \(2 \cdot m \cdot n\) in the following steps: Code: 23 10^X X≠Y? RTN I wasn't aware of FMT or probably just forgot about it. It makes for a nice listing: Code: 40 - FMT ACX RDN ACX RDN ACX Well done! |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
(41C) Pythagorean Triples - SlideRule - 10-15-2019, 12:57 PM
RE: (41C) Pythagorean Triples - Thomas Klemm - 06-25-2022, 03:40 PM
RE: (41C) Pythagorean Triples - C.Ret - 06-26-2022, 09:29 AM
RE: (41C) Pythagorean Triples - Thomas Klemm - 06-27-2022 05:51 AM
RE: (41C) Pythagorean Triples - Ángel Martin - 06-29-2022, 01:02 PM
RE: (41C) Pythagorean Triples - John Keith - 07-01-2022, 11:55 AM
RE: (41C) Pythagorean Triples - C.Ret - 07-03-2022, 08:18 AM
RE: (41C) Pythagorean Triples - John Keith - 07-03-2022, 01:55 PM
RE: (41C) Pythagorean Triples - Thomas Klemm - 07-03-2022, 10:46 AM
RE: (41C) Pythagorean Triples - C.Ret - 07-03-2022, 01:41 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)