Post Reply 
200LX, 17b, 19b - Solver Problem?
07-02-2019, 06:42 AM
Post: #13
RE: 200LX, 17b, 19b - Solver Problem?
Problem eventually solved. But further testing is needed.

Starting with

it was easily seen by the result of P, that only the last digit of the result
could have an influence onto the IP(#PP) further down the road.

By changing the expression to
+L(#PP:RND(1-T*#P/360+FP(G(N))*#P/#C:13)) ! 2 less than precision 15 on 200LX !
the results are now exactly as when calculated with the respective ROM routines.

(For 17b/19b it therefore should be precision 9 - 2 = 7.)

Also the plot of the equation for T is now w/o any steps.

That leads to the assumption, that any solver equation which allows for forward/backward solving in all variables should show stair-step free plots in the respective vars if mathematically sound.

Your comments are welcome.

Thanks again,
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Messages In This Thread
RE: 200LX, 17b, 19b - Solver Problem? - Peter A. Gebhardt - 07-02-2019 06:42 AM

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)