Post Reply 
So.. any improvements RPN-wise ???
03-29-2019, 02:22 PM
Post: #14
RE: So.. any improvements RPN-wise ???
(03-26-2019 11:51 PM)Lode Wrote:  
(03-26-2019 11:17 PM)Didier Lachieze Wrote:  It works in RPN, for example :

In RPN you have to specify the number of arguments to take from the stack (here it's one), because some functions may be called with different numbers of arguments.

I see! Problem solved, thanks Smile

Actually, to be honest, problem not that much solved... for unit conversions you also need to pass such extra argument to "convert", but it's for no actual reason at all (I don't see it do anything different when passing "3" instead of "2"), all it does is add extra unnecessary keypresses for unit conversions in RPN

I wish the functions would have a default amount of arguments in RPN and not require you to do this hassle.

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Messages In This Thread
RE: So.. any improvements RPN-wise ??? - Lode - 03-29-2019 02:22 PM

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)