Post Reply 
(12C) Signum Function
03-03-2019, 05:51 PM (This post was last modified: 03-03-2019 06:01 PM by Dieter.)
Post: #13
RE: (12C) Signum Function
(03-03-2019 03:34 PM)rprosperi Wrote:  On the initial 12CP (before the (), Undo and Backspace were added) the above program returns -1.00, but on later models (including the Android emulator) returns 123 as Gamo reported.

That's really weird. #-)

I wonder what happens in similar cases like

2 [+] [√x] [=]
or
5 [x] [LN] [x²] [=]

I'd expect 3,41 and 12,95 but obviously you never know...

Dieter
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
(12C) Signum Function - Gamo - 03-01-2019, 06:29 AM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Dieter - 03-04-2019, 10:57 AM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Gamo - 03-02-2019, 05:47 AM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Dieter - 03-02-2019, 05:22 PM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - rprosperi - 03-02-2019, 08:57 PM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Gamo - 03-03-2019, 02:31 AM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Dieter - 03-03-2019, 12:38 PM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Thomas Klemm - 03-03-2019, 08:17 AM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Albert Chan - 03-03-2019, 01:15 PM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Gamo - 03-03-2019, 02:39 PM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - rprosperi - 03-03-2019, 03:34 PM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Dieter - 03-03-2019 05:51 PM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Dieter - 03-04-2019, 10:49 AM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - rprosperi - 03-03-2019, 07:59 PM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Thomas Klemm - 03-03-2019, 04:59 PM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Albert Chan - 03-03-2019, 07:49 PM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Thomas Klemm - 03-03-2019, 11:27 PM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Albert Chan - 03-04-2019, 02:02 AM
RE: (12C) Signum Function - Gamo - 03-04-2019, 04:58 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)