41CL Maximum registers for DATA/PROGS storage
|
07-25-2018, 12:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-25-2018 12:09 PM by Ángel Martin.)
Post: #19
|
|||
|
|||
RE: 41CL Maximum registers for DATA/PROGS storage
(07-20-2018 06:22 AM)Podalirius Wrote: I readed Cl XPMEM manual: seems that the commands for use of the additional 1024 registers are more byte consuming. Looks like this thread is more about the RAMBOX but just for completion sake - yes, using the Expanded register functions (YSTO, YRCL, etc...) has a more demanding byte consumption. However you have more standard memory for your program code - since no standard DATA registers are needed. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)