Post Reply 
41CL Maximum registers for DATA/PROGS storage
07-25-2018, 12:09 PM (This post was last modified: 07-25-2018 12:09 PM by Ángel Martin.)
Post: #19
RE: 41CL Maximum registers for DATA/PROGS storage
(07-20-2018 06:22 AM)Podalirius Wrote:  I readed Cl XPMEM manual: seems that the commands for use of the additional 1024 registers are more byte consuming.

Looks like this thread is more about the RAMBOX but just for completion sake - yes, using the Expanded register functions (YSTO, YRCL, etc...) has a more demanding byte consumption. However you have more standard memory for your program code - since no standard DATA registers are needed.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: 41CL Maximum registers for DATA/PROGS storage - Ángel Martin - 07-25-2018 12:09 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)