RPL second impressions (HP 28)

[Thomas Klemm]

(06-29-2018 11:32 PM)Valentin Albillo Wrote:  Even Saturn assembler is much clearer in comparison.

(07-01-2018 09:54 PM)Valentin Albillo Wrote:  For HP-calc purposes, about 60-100 full 80-char lines is typical for me.

In particular the amount of code in your linked article falls for me in the "trivial size" bin.

That's great. Thus I assume these 109 lines of SysRPL code to calculate the complex inverse cosine are considered of "trivial size" as well.

I'm mostly interested in the HP-15C assembler code but I'm fine with the HP-71B as well.
Could you provide a similar analysis of this function so we could compare both results?

Many thanks in advance
Thomas