A (quite) accurate ln1+x function, or "how close can you get" part II
|
04-10-2014, 04:47 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: A (quite) accurate ln1+x function, or "how close can you get" part II
I'm curious about monotonic and inverse behaviors.
For a and a+ULP, is (f(a+ULP) - f(a)) positive, zero, or negative. Hopefully they'd all be positive, but it can happen that there's a place where you get a string of zeros where f(a) is changing much slower than a. You shouldn't ever find a negative. The value of the error of a-inverse(function(a)) and a-function(inverse(a)) would ideally be always zero, of course, but unless both the function and the inverse are absolutely monotonic that won't happen. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
A (quite) accurate ln1+x function, or "how close can you get" part II - Dieter - 04-09-2014, 06:44 PM
RE: A (quite) accurate ln1+x function, or "how close can you get" part II - htom trites - 04-10-2014 04:47 AM
RE: A (quite) accurate ln1+x function, or "how close can you get" part II - Dieter - 04-11-2014, 07:01 PM
RE: A (quite) accurate ln1+x function, or "how close can you get" part II - Albert Chan - 01-31-2019, 07:04 PM
RE: A (quite) accurate ln1+x function, or "how close can you get" part II - Albert Chan - 02-01-2019, 04:26 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)