Post Reply 
A (quite) accurate ln1+x function, or "how close can you get" part II
04-10-2014, 04:47 AM
Post: #2
RE: A (quite) accurate ln1+x function, or "how close can you get" part II
I'm curious about monotonic and inverse behaviors.

For a and a+ULP, is (f(a+ULP) - f(a)) positive, zero, or negative. Hopefully they'd all be positive, but it can happen that there's a place where you get a string of zeros where f(a) is changing much slower than a. You shouldn't ever find a negative.

The value of the error of a-inverse(function(a)) and a-function(inverse(a)) would ideally be always zero, of course, but unless both the function and the inverse are absolutely monotonic that won't happen.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: A (quite) accurate ln1+x function, or "how close can you get" part II - htom trites - 04-10-2014 04:47 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)