Forum behavior

[pier4r]

@Gene: congratz!

my I request an addition?
7: when you post a contribution don't assume that everyone can see through it, explain it! (I make reference to Gauss saying "an architect doesn't leave the scaffolding after the building is done", but please, don't follow Gauss in this case)


Also little OT request.
I noticed this http://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/search.php...75d6848104 as an episode of ragequit. As far as I understood, the guy did not like disagreements with his view. It seems sadly a pretty popular quality in online discussion.

Anyway this is not the main point. What I find nice is the "removal work" done in threads such as this: http://www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-10664.html . Such removal work doesn't disintegrate a thread.

In other words would be nice - but of course at the end the mod team decides, I can only hope - that if there are elements rocking the boat in a thread, but the thread has value in terms of point of views or information, the entire thread is saved while the posts identified as toxic are nuked.