Integration methods...an error-proof method?
|
09-03-2017, 05:24 AM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method?
Let me rephrase my earlier response: if your aim is to get an accurate approximation of the integral then you should not (use algorthims that) avoid "singularities", but you need to embrace, understand and deal with them.
Simply avoiding them (i.e. sweeping them under the rug) will give you an answer, but no indication as to how (in)accurate that answer is. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Matt Agajanian - 09-02-2017, 09:42 PM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Joe Horn - 09-02-2017, 10:21 PM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Matt Agajanian - 09-02-2017, 10:43 PM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Joe Horn - 09-02-2017, 11:05 PM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - AlexFekken - 09-03-2017, 02:47 AM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Paul Dale - 09-03-2017, 04:09 AM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - AlexFekken - 09-03-2017 05:24 AM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - Paul Dale - 09-03-2017, 06:30 AM
RE: Integration methods...an error-proof method? - AlexFekken - 09-03-2017, 08:07 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)