Post Reply 
Xcas Syntax / Prime Syntax (in particular computing in Z/pZ)
10-05-2014, 06:04 PM (This post was last modified: 10-05-2014 06:08 PM by Tim Wessman.)
Post: #11
RE: Xcas Syntax / Prime Syntax (in particular computing in Z/pZ)
You appear to be counting lines and not actually looking at the list itself.

The vast majority of them fall into 3 categories. Commands that are complete synonymns of others and ARE in there, just under one name instead of 2-5 different names for the same command, commands that are for drawing and doing UI things on the calculator (created for the 39gII, and turned off since the native functions can be used directly in the CAS now), and then things that don't make sense at all for the calculator (writewav,csv2gen,spread2mathml, etc).

Once you actually eliminate all of those, you are left with maybe 20-30 commands that were turned off because they were completely undocumented, untested, and need to have that done before allowing them to be used.

Are we really back to counting "functions" in order to determine capability?

TW

Although I work for HP, the views and opinions I post here are my own.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Xcas Syntax / Prime Syntax (in particular computing in Z/pZ) - Tim Wessman - 10-05-2014 06:04 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)