Post Reply 
For which models was 2^3>8?
04-04-2017, 07:42 PM
Post: #12
RE: For which models was 2^3>8?
(04-04-2017 07:18 PM)Dieter Wrote:  
(04-04-2017 06:45 PM)james summers Wrote:  Thanks for the great explanation, Dieter.

Just playing around, my MK-61, after a slight pause gives 7.9999993.
Doing [2] [ENTER] [ln] [3] [x] [ex] also gives 7.9999993.

Interesting. Without guard digits it should be 7.9999973. What are the intermediate results you get for lnĀ 2 and 3x this?

[2] [ln] = 6.9314717 E-01
[3] [x] = 2.0794415
[ex] b = 7.9999993


(04-04-2017 07:18 PM)Dieter Wrote:  
(04-04-2017 06:45 PM)james summers Wrote:  However, my 32E, 41CV and 15C, whilst giving [2] [ENTER] [3] [yx] as 8.000000000, for [2] [ENTER] [ln] [3] [x] [ex] they give 8.000000003.

Why do you add an [ENTER] before the log? It's classic RPN. ;-)

Because I'm an idiot! ;-)
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
For which models was 2^3>8? - Joe Horn - 04-04-2017, 05:03 AM
RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - Joe Horn - 04-04-2017, 12:17 PM
RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - pier4r - 04-04-2017, 05:20 PM
RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - Dieter - 04-04-2017, 05:51 PM
RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - pier4r - 04-04-2017, 06:10 PM
RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - bshoring - 04-04-2017, 06:16 PM
RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - teenix - 04-05-2017, 07:50 AM
RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - bshoring - 04-05-2017, 06:08 PM
RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - Dieter - 04-04-2017, 07:18 PM
RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - james summers - 04-04-2017 07:42 PM
RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - Dieter - 04-04-2017, 07:53 PM
RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - bshoring - 04-04-2017, 10:14 PM
RE: For which models was 2^3>8? - Andres - 06-23-2020, 04:39 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)