Post Reply 
Bug in Radians an Degrees (11226/10637)
01-11-2017, 06:56 PM (This post was last modified: 01-11-2017 07:03 PM by Tim Wessman.)
Post: #4
RE: Bug in Radians an Degrees (11226/10637)
Only when you are in radians mode, else it probably returns pi/4-45deg which is a bug in the TI methodology. What happens when you try it in degree/grads? Is that consistent with the behavior you are requesting?

Can you try .735398...-45deg? Why doesn't it assume that is a numerical radian value in this case?

Why should the system *assume* that plain untagged number is an angular value, let alone radians?

I'm fine to make changes with good reason, but simply "TI does it that way" is not really a good reason.


Although I work for HP, the views and opinions I post here are my own.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Messages In This Thread
RE: Bug in Radians an Degrees (11226/10637) - Tim Wessman - 01-11-2017 06:56 PM

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)