HP 50g & SD Cards: Performance, Format, Notes
|
07-20-2016, 04:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-20-2016 04:56 PM by Joe Horn.)
Post: #24
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP 50g & SD Cards: Performance, Format, Notes
(07-18-2016 04:33 AM)JDW Wrote: Joe, Good idea... so here it is. The following table supports my claim that card speed DOES matter, HUGELY in fact... but so does the FAT format. FAT32 and/or a slow card will dramatically slow down power-up and storing especially of large objects like backups. As you can see, the CAPACITY of the card doesn't seem to matter much, if at all. Sorry about the format ambiguity; all I know for sure is that Win7 says that these cards are formatted as "FAT". I'm guessing that means FAT16? Testing the differences between a nearly-empty card and a nearly-full card, and testing the 50g's speed of reading different cards, is left as an exercise for the reader. EDIT: My earlier claim of 200K backup in 1.5 seconds was mistaken. It was a 40K backup, not a 200K backup. It's the second card in the table below. <0|ΙΈ|0> -Joe- |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)