newRPL: Angles revisited

04032016, 08:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 04042016 10:56 AM by Vtile.)
Post: #23




RE: newRPL: Angles revisited
(04032016 04:27 PM)SlideRule Wrote:It is also measure of time ie. in EE with phasors (f=constant) if we get philosophical P=U*I*Cos(Phi), as it is there for the difference of the phase of the I and U in timedomain. Now when phasors are mentioned, will there be traditional nontagged method of using angles, by just using bare numbers. I think these two methods can't be separated in discussion they must work together and I go as far as saying that tagging should be more like an option to those who are jumping between O/(decided slicing method).(03312016 06:13 PM)Claudio L. Wrote: A few months back there was a discussion on how to treat angular values in trig functions. Ie. If I'm creating impedance (or any Dance) from capacitor 1/(j*2*Pi*f) etc. edit(.. and adding it ..) to existing impedance in polar representation in degrees I wouldn't want it to be some symbolic mess because of the 2*Pi which is radian representation of on full O. Interesting subject, I like to read these on MoHPC. Would be nice to know what angle is in an eyes of mathematician percentage, direction, factor, way of divide Italian food ?? 

« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)