Can we have RPN back?
|
02-10-2014, 01:53 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-10-2014 02:41 AM by Han.)
Post: #30
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Can we have RPN back?
They're all RPN, yes. But they can be distinguished by their programming "language."
Many of the calculators that have "immediate entry" (what a lot of folks call RPN -- see HP48 manual; I could not find a reference to RPN) rely on an RPL engine. I was specifically referring to the programming method. The older calculators had pgramming-by-keystroke only (what I am calling RPN machines) while the later models allowed the use of UserRPL (what I am calling RPL machines). They all, however, were running off of an RPL-based engine (running SysRPL, but only the later graphical models actually allowed users to type in commands as opposed to using keystrokes). The "RPN" calculators were limited to keystrokes and 4-level stacks. The "RPL" machines had a stack limited only by memory, and could be programed using RPL commands. The "RPL" machines no longer behaved like the "RPN" machines even at the keystroke level. DUP-on-ENTER was omitted; Stack Level X -- the equivalent of Stack Level 1, was no longer tied to the input/command line. However, there were still a number of similarities. That you may have never heard about the underlying layer is nothing out of the ordinary. It was never a regular term like RPN -- unless you did a lot of RPL programming. From the HP48 FAQ: Quote: RPL Even the HP42S has an RPL engine even though none of it was immediately available to the user. A quick disassembly will reveal a rudimentary version of RPL. I have not disassembled ALL Saturn-based calculators, but it would not surprise me the least if they all had some early form of RPL as the interface between user keystrokes and assembly code. Graph 3D | QPI | SolveSys |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)