newRPL: [UPDATED April 27-2017] Firmware for testing available for download

[matthiaspaul]

(09-05-2015 12:48 AM)Claudio L. Wrote:  The 49G+ had 3 batteries instead of 4, so the low battery warning probably needs different calibration.

I don't own a 49g+ so I don't know for sure, but since the ADC won't be able to cope with the full battery voltage anyway, the hardware will most probably contain some kind of voltage divider to bring down the maximum possible voltage to an acceptable voltage for the analog input. If so, the hardware developers might have adjusted the voltage divider so that the different nominal battery voltage would be transparent to the controller.

Quote:Debouncing the keyboard was originally calibrated for hpgcc on a 49G+, so we can reasonably expect good overall keyboard "feel", but it's an area to be tested too.

Don't they both run at 75 MHz by default? If so, keyboard debounce timing should be the same.

AFAIK, the 49g+ uses a Samsung S3C2410X01, the 50g a S3C2410A, but this shouldn't make much difference.

Greetings,

Matthias