newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal
|
06-03-2015, 01:27 AM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal
(06-02-2015 12:19 PM)Claudio L. Wrote: Now besides implementation issues (which I'm sure I'll run into several), are there any objections from the RPL language point of view? or math point of view? Aside from the virtues and possible issues with this approach, which I honestly can't address, I've a short question. One of NewRPL's original goals, I think/thought, was to be compatible with a large percentage of existing RPL code. It seems that a change such as this would break an awful lot of existing code wouldn't it? I'm not really for or against this proposal, just wondering if my understanding was correct, and if so, how does this change impact that goal? --Bob Prosperi |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-01-2015, 07:20 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Werner - 06-01-2015, 08:48 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-02-2015, 12:46 AM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Paul Dale - 06-01-2015, 10:24 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-02-2015, 01:37 AM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-02-2015, 12:19 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - rprosperi - 06-03-2015 01:27 AM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-03-2015, 01:21 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - rprosperi - 06-05-2015, 11:41 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-08-2015, 12:50 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - 3298 - 06-08-2015, 04:39 PM
RE: newRPL: Simplified matrices proposal - Claudio L. - 06-08-2015, 06:16 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)