Post Reply 
WP 34S integration accuracy
09-05-2015, 10:48 AM
Post: #9
RE: WP 34S integration accuracy
(09-02-2015 04:22 PM)ijabbott Wrote:  The exact answer according to my HP 50g is "99*LN(9801)+10*LN(5)-208"
That's strange. Why aren't both limits handled the same way which results in:

198*LN(99)+10*LN(5)-208

Quote:I'm guessing it's the improper nature of the definite integral which is throwing things out of whack.
You could split the integral into 3 parts: [-5, -1], [-1, 1] and [1, 99] and use that \(\int_{-1}^{1}\log(x^2)dx=-4\).
Or then split it into: [-5, -e], [-e, e] and [e, 99] and use that \(\int_{-e}^{e}\log(x^2)dx=0\).
The remaining integrals should be calculated fast then.

Cheers
Thomas
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
WP 34S integration accuracy - lrdheat - 04-01-2015, 05:55 PM
RE: WP 34S integration accuracy - lrdheat - 04-01-2015, 06:19 PM
RE: WP 34S integration accuracy - walter b - 04-08-2015, 07:20 AM
RE: WP 34S integration accuracy - Dieter - 04-21-2015, 09:29 PM
RE: WP 34S integration accuracy - ijabbott - 09-02-2015, 04:22 PM
RE: WP 34S integration accuracy - lrdheat - 09-04-2015, 07:47 PM
RE: WP 34S integration accuracy - lrdheat - 09-04-2015, 07:52 PM
RE: WP 34S integration accuracy - Gerald H - 09-05-2015, 05:18 AM
RE: WP 34S integration accuracy - Thomas Klemm - 09-05-2015 10:48 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)