[CAS] sum

12172014, 11:21 AM
Post: #7




RE: [CAS] sum
Hello,
As was already pointed out, you should do ∑(approx(sin(n)/n,...) instead of approx(∑(sin(n)/n,...)) to avoid forcing the CAS to build really long symbolic terms. But what makes me wonder is why the "undef" result. For example: sum(1/k,k=1..n) returns "undef" if there aren't any assumptions made about n ("euler_gamma+Psi(n+1)" if assume(n>0)). On the other side: sum(1/k,k=1..n) returns just the term I've entered (regardless of assumptions about n). Despite both sums should return the same, I'm fine with the latter since it tells me the CAS wasn't able to find a closed form solution. But the first result "undef" seems wrong to me (I'd expect it for such cases like 0/0 etc.) and hard to track if the sum is part of a bigger expression. (I've set automatic simplification to "None") 

« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread 
[CAS] sum  compsystems  12172014, 03:04 AM
RE: [CAS] sum  Helge Gabert  12172014, 03:20 AM
RE: [CAS] sum  compsystems  12172014, 03:35 AM
RE: [CAS] sum  Helge Gabert  12172014, 03:41 AM
RE: [CAS] sum  Han  12172014, 03:43 AM
RE: [CAS] sum  parisse  12172014, 08:11 AM
RE: [CAS] sum  Snorre  12172014 11:21 AM

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)