Post Reply 
[CAS] sum
12-17-2014, 11:21 AM
Post: #7
RE: [CAS] sum

As was already pointed out, you should do ∑(approx(sin(n)/n,...) instead of approx(∑(sin(n)/n,...)) to avoid forcing the CAS to build really long symbolic terms.

But what makes me wonder is why the "undef" result.
For example: sum(1/k,k=1..n) returns "undef" if there aren't any assumptions made about n ("euler_gamma+Psi(n+1)" if assume(n>0)).
On the other side: sum(1/|k|,k=1..n) returns just the term I've entered (regardless of assumptions about n).

Despite both sums should return the same, I'm fine with the latter since it tells me the CAS wasn't able to find a closed form solution.
But the first result "undef" seems wrong to me (I'd expect it for such cases like 0/0 etc.) and hard to track if the sum is part of a bigger expression.
(I've set automatic simplification to "None")
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Messages In This Thread
[CAS] sum - compsystems - 12-17-2014, 03:04 AM
RE: [CAS] sum - Helge Gabert - 12-17-2014, 03:20 AM
RE: [CAS] sum - compsystems - 12-17-2014, 03:35 AM
RE: [CAS] sum - Helge Gabert - 12-17-2014, 03:41 AM
RE: [CAS] sum - Han - 12-17-2014, 03:43 AM
RE: [CAS] sum - parisse - 12-17-2014, 08:11 AM
RE: [CAS] sum - Snorre - 12-17-2014 11:21 AM

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)