Set theory (operators)
|
10-24-2014, 10:39 AM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Set theory (operators)
I considered "Define"-ing Set operations using appropriate notation symbols as well, but it takes something like 11 pages of "Chars" to sort through to get to the needed symbols; hardly worth the effort. It's quicker just typing function keywords!
Education being the Prime's target market, it was fitting that there might be some kind of more direct way to perform set operations. As something encountered all the time by students of mathematics, many useful applications exist outside the classroom, for which the secondary market (the rest of us!), might also exploit. If nothing else, the "Entry Line" would be easier to work with, using ONE character instead of the parenthetically embedded functions, to mix the expressions! Perhaps set notation will become part of some future calculation device, although marketers may have found this topic unworthy of production. -Dale- |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Set theory (operators) - DrD - 10-21-2014, 04:15 PM
RE: Set theory (operators) - Han - 10-22-2014, 03:36 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - DrD - 10-22-2014, 11:01 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - Joe Horn - 10-23-2014, 08:25 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - Alberto Candel - 10-22-2014, 03:22 PM
RE: Set theory (operators) - dbbotkin - 10-24-2014, 01:57 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - Joe Horn - 10-24-2014, 03:57 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - Alberto Candel - 10-24-2014, 04:26 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - Joe Horn - 10-24-2014, 02:43 PM
RE: Set theory (operators) - DrD - 10-24-2014 10:39 AM
RE: Set theory (operators) - DrD - 10-24-2014, 05:31 PM
RE: Set theory (operators) - parisse - 10-24-2014, 08:39 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)