Post Reply 
Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion
10-18-2014, 05:32 PM
Post: #5
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion
(10-18-2014 04:40 PM)Werner Wrote:  WP-34S' SIN(PI) in double precision is correct to 17 digits.

Mine gives -1.15 x 10^-34 which seems more than 17 digits precision. Am I missing something?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - pascal_meheut - 10-18-2014 05:32 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)