Probability Functions: order of arguments insanity

[rkf]

A student in a German HP Prime forum came up with the reasonable question, why following inconsistency was implemented (cited via copy&paste from User_Guide_EN.pdf):

for the density function:

BINOMIAL(n,k,p)

for the cumulative distribution function:

BINOMIAL_CDF(n,p,k)

What the heck was the reason for swapping the order of 2nd and 3rd arguments? Please please HP, enlighten us!!

Kind regards,
Ralf.