Thread Closed 
history of the 4-level stack
09-11-2014, 02:31 AM
Post: #22
RE: history of the 4-level stack
(09-10-2014 02:16 PM)walter b Wrote:  Why? If a calc features up to 100 registers (00 ... 99) then "STO 11" doesn't require a trailing ENTER. What did I miss?

I agree, this doesn't make sense -- unless he meant to indicate a SINGLE-digit storage register in a calc with 100 registers. For example, "1 STO" is complete and unambiguous in this case, but "STO 1" requires a trailing ENTER (or a leading 0 before the 1).

John
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed 


Messages In This Thread
history of the 4-level stack - axd1967 - 09-05-2014, 09:11 PM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - d b - 09-11-2014, 07:21 PM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - axd1967 - 09-06-2014, 05:15 PM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - jebem - 09-06-2014, 07:33 AM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - axd1967 - 09-06-2014, 05:27 PM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - axd1967 - 09-06-2014, 06:06 PM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - axd1967 - 09-07-2014, 10:19 AM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - axd1967 - 09-07-2014, 10:04 AM
OT: deep stack issues - axd1967 - 09-07-2014, 02:21 PM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - axd1967 - 09-07-2014, 03:13 PM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - John R - 09-11-2014 02:31 AM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - John R - 09-11-2014, 02:39 AM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - axd1967 - 09-11-2014, 08:35 AM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - John R - 09-11-2014, 01:22 PM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - axd1967 - 09-10-2014, 09:35 AM
RE: history of the 4-level stack - axd1967 - 09-11-2014, 05:13 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)