history of the 4-level stack
|
09-10-2014, 02:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2014 02:18 PM by walter b.)
Post: #21
|
|||
|
|||
RE: history of the 4-level stack
Thanks for bringing this info to our attention.
(09-10-2014 12:45 AM)Jeff_Kearns Wrote: I probably would have used postfix on store if we had more than 10 storage cells (0-9), but "STO N" seemed much more easily understood than "N STO". Fullheartedly concur with that. But now the next sentence following: Quote:However with more than 10 numeric memory cells then RPN would have won because it saves a keystroke. "STO 11" would have to be "STO 11 Enter" vs. "11 STO". Why? If a calc features up to 100 registers (00 ... 99) then "STO 11" doesn't require a trailing ENTER. What did I miss? d:-? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)