Search
Member List
Calendar
Help
HP Forums
/
Not HP Calculators
/
Not remotely HP Calculators 
/
Putting Casio fx-991CW in perspective.
/
Putting Casio fx-991CW in perspective.
|
Putting Casio fx-991CW in perspective.
|
|
09-23-2023, 06:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-23-2023 06:51 PM by carey.)
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Putting Casio fx-991CW in perspective.
(09-23-2023 05:19 PM)Csaba Tizedes Wrote: MoHPC don't like Youtube shorts.... (09-23-2023 05:21 PM)Csaba Tizedes Wrote: Same, without d/dx() Csaba, These videos are great -- very nicely done! Thank you for sharing them! A quick question about Newton's method (shown in the videos). Newton's method has stood the test of time and has sound justification in Taylor series. Of the dozens* of other root-finding methods that have been developed over the years, some general and some claiming to have advantages in special situations, are there one or two of these alternative methods that you have found particularly worthwhile to try in situations where Newton's method doesn't perform well? Thanks! * Alternative root-finding methods include bisection, secant, regula falsi, Halley's, Broyden's, fixed point iteration, Steffenson's, Ridder's, Brent's, Muller's, Bairstow's, Durand-Kerner, and more...! |
|||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)