lambertw, all branches
|
01-25-2024, 12:37 AM
Post: #46
|
|||
|
|||
RE: lambertw, all branches
I try with Wolfram
W0 (-1.2E-323) and get the correct answer, ie about -1.2E-323. Curiously, it offers the possibility to get more digits, two times, but does not show them at the second request. More strange: when I ask W0 (-1.2E-324), I don't get now the expected approximate value -1.2E-324, but directly zero. Why this distinction at -1E-323/E-324? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)