User-defined functions in Free42

[Paul Dale]

RESTORE seems kind of funny. Is there a practical use case for it? So long as FUNCn nests properly, I'm not sure why.

Two things the 34S's xIN command allows that aren't supported by this proposal:

• Any number arguments. E.g. the %MMR function takes three inputs.
• The number of output arguments. This permits the implementation of functions like R->P.
  

I don't know if either is worth the hassle or not.

A thought: could the FUNC command take an argument instead of having the behaviour encoded into the command name?


Pauli