Post Reply 
RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57)
02-16-2020, 05:22 PM
Post: #7
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57)
(02-16-2020 03:48 PM)lrdheat Wrote:  ...to be clear, I am comparing text book vs RPN entry. I find algebraic entry prone to symbolic error (did I handle ()’s correctly), but not satisfying in being intimately involved from a math viewpoint.

It depends on the calculator. The algebraics with an input line let you see the full expression, although it is still possible to make mistakes, e.g. -2 ^ 8 versus (-2) ^ 8.

Algebraics without an input line will indicate that you've exceeded the stack size of pending operations or exceeded the maximum number of nested parentheses. An RPN calculator with a fixed copy-down stack will silently lose stuff off the top of the stack and produce incorrect results it you enter an expression that is too complicated.

— Ian Abbott
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - SlideRule - 02-10-2020, 12:23 PM
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - Dave Britten - 02-15-2020, 10:43 PM
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - toml_12953 - 02-16-2020, 01:53 AM
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - Dave Britten - 02-16-2020, 02:04 AM
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - lrdheat - 02-16-2020, 03:41 PM
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - lrdheat - 02-16-2020, 03:48 PM
RE: RPN(HP-31) vs AN(TI-57) - ijabbott - 02-16-2020 05:22 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)