So.. any improvements RPN-wise ???

[Wes Loewer]

(03-22-2019 09:25 AM)Tim Wessman Wrote:  RPN does not suck. You just can't program in RPN/RPL.

While it was highly satisfying to come up with a really compact RPL program (like Joe Horn's parallel resistors program \<< * LASTARG + / \>> ), using PPL is definitely better for longer programs. When I look back at some of my old RPL code, I have to step through them to remember what in the world I was doing. It's not unlike when I look back through my old ASM code.

One thing in my pipe dream wish list would be the ability to access and modify the RPN stack from within a PPL program. That would make RPN much more robust.