Post Reply 
TI-36X Pro—Replace the batteries or just get a new one?
01-20-2019, 09:26 PM (This post was last modified: 01-20-2019 09:36 PM by ijabbott.)
Post: #56
RE: TI-36X Pro—Replace the batteries or just get a new one?
(01-20-2019 07:45 PM)pier4r Wrote:  
(01-19-2019 09:37 PM)ijabbott Wrote:  Test 6 - VBlogMag's \( e^{x^3} \) integration test

This is an integration test from VBlogMag's calculator benchmark video: https://youtu.be/DHRsvSTGiBc?t=584
\[ \int_0^6 e^{x^3} dx \\
\\
\begin{array}{c|r}
\text{Model} & \text{Time (s)} \\
\hline
\text{TI-30X Pro MP} & 8.6 \\
\text{TI-36X Pro} & 89.3 \\
\text{Casio fx-991EX} & 24.4
\end{array} \]

Nice work, thanks for sharing and great that you put the link to the sources!

Thanks!

I'm a bit puzzled why my time for my TI-36X Pro was about 19 seconds shorter than VBlogMag's (real name Martin Lorton). I know his calculator is older than mine since the video is from Feb 2014 and my TI-36X Pro has a 2015 manufacturing code (L-0315B - Kinpo Philippines, March 2015, revision B), so perhaps they increased the speed or improved the algorithm a bit. (I also have a TI-30X Pro MultiView (same as a TI-36X Pro) with a 2016 manufacturing code L-0416B. That is more or less the same speed as my TI-36X Pro - less than a second faster on this test. I can put that slight difference down to oscillator tolerances.)

— Ian Abbott
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: TI-36X Pro—Replace the batteries or just get a new one? - ijabbott - 01-20-2019 09:26 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)